Search this page for:
 
.
.
"Major Discovery" From MIT Primed to Unleash Solar Revolution
.
 

»

by: Anne Trafton, MIT News


MIT's Professor Daniel G. Nocera has discovered a way to do large-scale solar power generation.

Scientists mimic essence of plants' energy storage system.

    In a revolutionary leap that could transform solar power from a marginal, boutique alternative into a mainstream energy source, MIT researchers have overcome a major barrier to large-scale solar power: storing energy for use when the sun doesn't shine.

    Until now, solar power has been a daytime-only energy source, because storing extra solar energy for later use is prohibitively expensive and grossly inefficient. With today's announcement, MIT researchers have hit upon a simple, inexpensive, highly efficient process for storing solar energy.

    Requiring nothing but abundant, non-toxic natural materials, this discovery could unlock the most potent, carbon-free energy source of all: the sun. "This is the nirvana of what we've been talking about for years," said MIT's Daniel Nocera, the Henry Dreyfus Professor of Energy at MIT and senior author of a paper describing the work in the July 31 issue of Science. "Solar power has always been a limited, far-off solution. Now we can seriously think about solar power as unlimited and soon."

    Inspired by the photosynthesis performed by plants, Nocera and Matthew Kanan, a postdoctoral fellow in Nocera's lab, have developed an unprecedented process that will allow the sun's energy to be used to split water into hydrogen and oxygen gases. Later, the oxygen and hydrogen may be recombined inside a fuel cell, creating carbon-free electricity to power your house or your electric car, day or night.

    The key component in Nocera and Kanan's new process is a new catalyst that produces oxygen gas from water; another catalyst produces valuable hydrogen gas. The new catalyst consists of cobalt metal, phosphate and an electrode, placed in water. When electricity - whether from a photovoltaic cell, a wind turbine or any other source - runs through the electrode, the cobalt and phosphate form a thin film on the electrode, and oxygen gas is produced.

    Combined with another catalyst, such as platinum, that can produce hydrogen gas from water, the system can duplicate the water splitting reaction that occurs during photosynthesis.

    The new catalyst works at room temperature, in neutral pH water, and it's easy to set up, Nocera said. "That's why I know this is going to work. It's so easy to implement," he said.

    "Giant Leap" for Clean Energy

    Sunlight has the greatest potential of any power source to solve the world's energy problems, said Nocera. In one hour, enough sunlight strikes the Earth to provide the entire planet's energy needs for one year.

    James Barber, a leader in the study of photosynthesis who was not involved in this research, called the discovery by Nocera and Kanan a "giant leap" toward generating clean, carbon-free energy on a massive scale.

    "This is a major discovery with enormous implications for the future prosperity of humankind," said Barber, the Ernst Chain Professor of Biochemistry at Imperial College London. "The importance of their discovery cannot be overstated since it opens up the door for developing new technologies for energy production thus reducing our dependence for fossil fuels and addressing the global climate change problem."

    "Just the Beginning"

    Currently available electrolyzers, which split water with electricity and are often used industrially, are not suited for artificial photosynthesis because they are very expensive and require a highly basic (non-benign) environment that has little to do with the conditions under which photosynthesis operates.

    More engineering work needs to be done to integrate the new scientific discovery into existing photovoltaic systems, but Nocera said he is confident that such systems will become a reality.

    "This is just the beginning," said Nocera, principal investigator for the Solar Revolution Project funded by the Chesonis Family Foundation and co-Director of the Eni-MIT Solar Frontiers Center. "The scientific community is really going to run with this."

    Nocera hopes that within 10 years, homeowners will be able to power their homes in daylight through photovoltaic cells, while using excess solar energy to produce hydrogen and oxygen to power their own household fuel cell. Electricity-by-wire from a central source could be a thing of the past.

    The project is part of the MIT Energy Initiative, a program designed to help transform the global energy system to meet the needs of the future and to help build a bridge to that future by improving today's energy systems. MITEI Director Ernest Moniz, Cecil and Ida Green Professor of Physics and Engineering Systems, noted that "this discovery in the Nocera lab demonstrates that moving up the transformation of our energy supply system to one based on renewables will depend heavily on frontier basic science."

    The success of the Nocera lab shows the impact of a mixture of funding sources - governments, philanthropy, and industry. This project was funded by the National Science Foundation and by the Chesonis Family Foundation, which gave MIT $10 million this spring to launch the Solar Revolution Project, with a goal to make the large scale deployment of solar energy within 10 years.

»

Comments

While a clean and efficient

While a clean and efficient form of electrolysis is great, it doesn't solve the efficiency problem of solar PV technology. At best one would be storing 25% of the available energy. It would be much more exciting to see a thermal technology for splitting water into hydrogen and oxygen at reasonable temperatures. In the meantime, nanotechnology antenna-based approaches to increasing PV efficiency at lower cost seem like the most promising areas of research. (To "Just a little algebra", I'm not sure where you got the 1.35 W/m^2 figure, but my understanding is that it's closer to 1 kW/m^2 raw solar power density. Solar may not meet all our energy needs, but it seems short-sighted to reject it out of hand.)

Actually, the electrical

Actually, the electrical grid does not store electricity, it's just a distribution system. However, the most practical solution may be rooftop solar cells feeding electricity to community or regional fuel cells that can handle the storage of hydrogen. That way, homeowners can use all the electricity they need, sending the excess back through the grid to the hydrogen production facility. The fuel cell would operate at night, putting electricity into the grid. This is a much simpler, elegant solution than having homeowners produce, store, and convert hydrogen into electricity. Wind turbines could also be integrated into this distributed generation and storage system.

Yes, I believe that Exxon or

Yes, I believe that Exxon or the like will most likely buy up all the applicable patents and put them in a vault for the next 100 or so years. Nice thought though.

Just a little algebra: Take

Just a little algebra: Take the cross sectional are of Planet earth, multiply ist by the 1.35 watts per meter squared ( neglect the albedo), multiply this by 24 hours and 365 days, convert this to Quads of energy. Now get the DOE report on World Consumption of Energy - given in Quads- and compare the two values. Now one is prepared to evaluate this MIT finding accordingly.

And Oh I had not realized

And Oh I had not realized that solar is a: "marginal, boutique alternative"

So what does this have to do

So what does this have to do with photosynthesis? I emailed the "scientist" to ask what was different from the plain old process. I'll post his answer if its worth it. The grid can be a sort of storage in that the places with sun can feed the places in night to some degree, depending on line losses... Personally I'm waiting for a good cheap Battery.

I notice funding didn't come

I notice funding didn't come from our government. DOE had nothing to do with it. Doesn't that seem a bit odd? Shouldn't they be involved BIG TIME in developing this? But, alas...there is no big money to be made here. A patent will taken out on the process and then snapped up by Exxon and we will never again hear about it again...like the 100 mpg carb...like the EV-1 electric car...

Solar technology works

Solar technology works today, even here in the Emerald City. Using the grid 'as storage' is factually not accurate, but is easy for the average person to understand. You you get a credit for solar electric production by spinning your meter backwards during the day, and you 'buy' back those same electrons at night. The net effect is the same as if you had batteries, but without the cost, maintenance, and hit in performance that introducing batteries into a PV system brings.

I too love simplicity. If

I too love simplicity. If you make something that uses a resource that is in abundance, you will succeed. Our nation was built on abundant energy giving us everything we have today. The auto industry, the diverse food we eat... and now a painfully simple way of storing energy. Look at the full report and digest the implications. No change to the environment during the manufacturing and disposal of the ingredient in this product. Compare that to all the current storage technologies. Properly marketed and the world cant say no. Big corporate interests standing in the way? Times have changed since the 70s and 80s. The Smart ones will simply step in like every one is jumping on the "Go Green" movement. LOL.

Hydrogen highway, here we

Hydrogen highway, here we come! This technology promises to revolutionize transportation fuels, as well. While this technology could be used to power fuel cells for transportation, if it really is this efficient, it stands to reason that it can also be used as an inexpensive way to produce hydrogen for internal combustion engines. The left over oxygen can be used for industrial purposes or just vented to the environment. Automakers have already produced IC engines that can run on either gasoline or hydrogen (e.g. BMW), but the barrier has been the high cost of producing hydrogen on an industrial scale. Now, however, such engines combined with this new technology could be the long-awaited intermediary step that allows the U.S. to wean itself off of gasoline as its primary transportation fuel source. Just imagine it - solar to hydrogen to your fuel tank. It's domestic, renewable and sustainable. DRS. What more could you want? In fact, one day, you could even produce your own hydrogen at home. Now that is true energy independence.

Wonderful news! Within the

Wonderful news! Within the next three years, I hope MIT seriously links with product/service producers -- and gets this going like the wind power sphere is doing and T. Boone Pickens talking it up across America in town meetings too. I can hardly wait! When I read the following I see hope for millions of Americans held hostage by increasing oil greed: "Nocera hopes that within 10 years, homeowners will be able to power their homes in daylight through photovoltaic cells, while using excess solar energy to produce hydrogen and oxygen to power their own household fuel cell. Electricity-by-wire from a central source could be a thing of the past."

Umm... sorry to burst your

Umm... sorry to burst your bubble, MIT, but "homeowners" are not too likely to be making their own hydrogen and oxygen gasses in their backyards. Both H2 and O2 are highly flammable, difficult to store, and extremely reactive with other substances. Technologists will reply that technology will take care of all these minor issues. Real-world events have proven over and over that overhyped technologies usually create more problems than they solve. (e.g. nuclear power, genetically modified organisms, etc.) Much of current scientific research looks at problems in isolation rather than thinking within the context of whole systems. KISS, and be skeptical.

An MIT professor developed

An MIT professor developed ink jet technology for stereolithography in the late '80s. This approach was applied rapidly in industry, dramatically shortening research and development time and cost. Solar power is a lifeline to the earth. Practical application can begin shortly. As "It'll take less than 5 years" for the oil interests to kill this technology warns, we must exercise extreme vigilance to obtain this goal.

What good news in an

What good news in an otherwise steady stream of bad news! Decentralized power, buildings like trees, each generating it's own clean power. The implementation can't happen fast enough.

Duh-uh. This is an energy

Duh-uh. This is an energy transfer solution available since the 70s when we were already using solar power to split hydrogen off from water and using it for automotive fuel purposes rather than storing it for off-peak hour energy generation as proposed here. Jack Nicholson drove a hydrogen-powered Chevy in 1978, for Pete's sake. The electrical grid is a very expensive and inefficient method for transmitting solar power or any other form of energy, let alone "storing" it. Get your facts straight. The power grid does however have great potential for use as part of a worldwide power web, much like the internet, to transfer energy from one part of the globe to another. If every home in Southern California had PV solar cells on their rooftops, generating power during peak hours while everyone was at work would seriously bring down the price per peak watt. Intelligent government would subsidize such a project, as it does in other countries, but there isn't much of a chance of that happening here as long as money remains the driving force of politics and unrestrained capitalism is the be-all, end-all of American life.

without a financial and

without a financial and physical comparison with classic electrolysis this article lacks a sense of reality

This is interesting, though

This is interesting, though it should be said that storage is not the only major challenge for solar. A more important challenge for scaling up could be the limited supply of key materials to make photovoltaic cells. There are other solar strategies being researched that skip photovoltaics. One uses mirrors to direct light to heat water. The resulting steam drives turbines. We should not be surprised that the MIT author of the article would oversimplify the situation, but it is a bit of a blemish on Truthout's generally solid record that they published without caveat an article written by someone who has an obvious conflict of interest.

"The electrical grid is a

"The electrical grid is a very efficient and cost effective method for storing solar power. Get your facts straight." -- Dan Foster Dan, the electrical grid does not store energy.

It'll take less than 5 years

It'll take less than 5 years for the oil people to negate this research through federal oversight that will slow the entire process down until the oil is gone, or until they can figure out a way to remove an integral component of the process to inhibit it's reaching the consumer market.

I'm also confused about the

I'm also confused about the two-step process. If you pull oxygen out of the water you're left with excess hydrogen. Why is there then a need to use another catalyst to free the hydrogen? Isn't it already freed from its bond with the oxygen?

"Until now, solar power

"Until now, solar power has been a daytime-only energy source, because storing extra solar energy for later use is prohibitively expensive and grossly inefficient" The electrical grid is a very efficient and cost effective method for storing solar power. Get your facts straight.

Glad to see the practical

Glad to see the practical application of high school chemistry 101 demonstration of electrolysis coming full circle. We are always looking for complex solutions for complex problems. Often it is the simple solutions that are the most elegant and practical. Why develop complex tools when a paper clip could solve the problem.

This is the best

This is the best environmental news I've seen in months--maybe years!

What does this have to do

What does this have to do with solar? This is basically battery technology (which we need). The trouble with solar isn't that it isn't available at night, that is one of its benefits (since electrical demand is highest during the day). The trouble is price per peak watt is still too high.
.
.