AKLALET, ERITREA -- In an area where little seems to have
changed since Biblical times, engineers armed with laptops are bringing
water to tens of thousands of refugees.
The challenge will be to keep the water flowing.
Aid workers in the Red Sea state of Eritrea are facing a
dilemma that confronts attempts by foreigners to help countries across
Africa: how to make sure projects survive when the foreigners go home.
"It's all very well to provide bags of food and buckets
of water and have a doctor jab them in the arm, but nothing's going to
stay forever," said Paul de Launay, an Australian water specialist with
the Office of the United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees.
"We have to ensure that they can continue and even build
on it. That's a very big consideration for us," he said, sweat trickling
down his brow in the searing midday sun.
Behind him a generator roars into life, pumping water to
the village of Aklalet, where residents use gleaming new taps provided by
the UNHCR to help the thousands of refugees returning from neighbouring
Sudan to a landscape of arid plains.
By the end of the next year, Mr. de Launay says, he is
likely to have moved on to help refugees in another remote corner of the
world. But the Eritrean government, like so many in Africa, will have
problems filling the void alone.
Using a computer presentation, Mr. de Launay explains
that if the government or donors do not take steps to build on the project
then 99 per cent of the refugees will have insufficient water or land by
2007, perhaps leaving them worse off than in Sudan.
One thing is certain: On the scorching plains of
Eritrea's Gash Barka province, water is precious as gold.
For locals who have in the past simply drawn water in
buckets from stagnant pools in dry river beds, there seems no doubt that
the project is working.
"There's enough water for us, it's excellent," said
28-year-old Fatima Idriss, filling a jerry can in the middle of the
village at a UNHCR tap. "Before we were getting water only from the tanker
truck, now you can get it at any time."
In Gash Barka, rivers turn into dust pans during the dry
season and rainfall all but ceases.
Aid workers have tapped water from underground rocks,
part of a project that will cost the equivalent of $12-million in 2002 to
drill boreholes and to set up schools and clinics for the refugees
returning after up to 30 years in Sudan.
The problem is that boreholes are not as simple as they
look. They can run dry, pumps break down, spares are hard to come by and
villagers need to be trained in maintenance.
Africa is littered with projects that failed because they
were not suited to their surroundings, but the UNHCR says it is doing all
it can to ensure that this one will survive and other donors will continue
the work.
Eritrea has a fierce belief in self-reliance forged
during a 30-year liberation struggle with Ethiopia, but the fact remains
that it has precious few resources to help itself.
The country of 3.7 million typifies many of the problems
of states across the continent: war, hunger, strained relations with
donors.
European donors have frozen non-humanitarian aid amid
concerns over government authoritarianism, while a border war between 1998
and 2000 disrupted farming and devastated the economy.
The government complains that the West is more than
happy to shell out cash to pay for emergency situations when famine or
drought hit the television screens while claiming the cupboards are bare
when it comes to investing in the future.
Worse still, with the threat of famine looming over vast
swathes of southern Africa and with donors preoccupied with Afghanistan,
Eritreans say their pleas for help, like many others in less glamorous
locations, go unheard.
"In an emergency, donors are interested. But when it
comes to support and rehabilitation programs the support is very slow,"
said Ibrahim Said, director of relief and logistics at the Eritrean Relief
and Refugee Commission.
"You go into a vicious circle. You're back to an
emergency situation and you need to ask the donors
again."