After three years of drought, humanitarian aid organisations 
          have come to the rescue of the famine-stricken Ogaden in southeast Ethiopia. 
          But this disaster has little to do with nature. Rather, the famine has 
          been cynically staged with the aim of attracting maximum international 
          aid and capturing votes. by SYLVIE BRUNEL *  
        
        Drought is again affecting the Ogaden. The 3.5m Somalis who 
          live in this region of Ethiopia have suffered from it for three years 
          running. Water resources have become scarce and the land has been over-grazed; 
          climatic difficulties, common in the Sahel, have made the growing imbalance 
          between the area's capacity and utilisation all the clearer.  
         
          The Ogaden economy, directed towards the east rather than to Ethiopia, 
          has suffered a succession of setbacks: the war in Somalia from 1991, 
          a change in Saudi Arabia's sanitary regulations - depriving the region 
          of its traditional cattle exports - recurring droughts, occasional floods 
          and permanent insecurity. Last year, while the rest of Ethiopia harvested 
          a grain surplus, the Ogaden suffered a serious loss: the drought destroyed 
          90% of the crops and spread unusually far into the south. The price 
          of cattle has crashed while the cost of food has risen dramatically. 
          The death of a large part of the bovine herds from starvation signals 
          a breaking point.  
         
          Yet the Ethiopian authorities controlled the deep wells - still being 
          replenished, unlike the traditional wells managed by the clans, which 
          had dried up at the onset of the crisis. So they could have intervened 
          to make up for the lack of rain and avoid concentrations of men and 
          cattle around the wells. Due to high demand near sources of water, the 
          land is quickly grazed out.  
         
          Ethiopia is one of the few African countries where the public crisis 
          management system works. An early warning system was put in place in 
          1976 and the Disaster Prevention and Preparedness Commission (DPPC), 
          a legacy of the 1984-85 famine, ensures that famines are avoided. Its 
          results are satisfactory, thanks to security stocks that are released 
          on the market in case of abnormal price hikes. The DPPC was thus able 
          to avoid shortages, in spite of the lack of rain in the Tigray, in the 
          northern part of the country, Prime Minister Meles Zenawi's home province. 
           
         
          Preventive distribution of food, a reduction in herd size by regulating 
          the purchasing system as well as the implementation of the early warning 
          systems (EWS) would have avoided disaster. But the EWS is prevented 
          from operating in the pasture zones, even though they are fragile, by 
          restrictions of movement imposed on UN agencies and other non-governmental 
          organisations (NGO). In fact, the country thinks it is sufficiently 
          organised not to need international NGOs unless they are limited to 
          giving technical assistance and financial aid to the authorities. The 
          NGO's capacity to react in emergencies is destroyed by permanent harassment: 
          long approval procedures and various other hindrances, such as limiting 
          the number of authorised vehicles, forbidding the use of trucks, helicopters 
          and cell phones, limiting communications to radio exchanges, and putting 
          heavy taxes on incoming goods.  
         
          Insecurity hampers the development of humanitarian programmes. In 1977 
          military occupation of the Ogaden by Somalia unleashed an international 
          conflict. Today, this insecurity continues on account of numerous separatist 
          movements, in particular Ittihad al-Islam and the Ogaden National Liberation 
          Front (ONLF), both supported by Somalia. The country lives in a state 
          of chronic war, with constant confrontations between clans, between 
          the military and the rebels, and between the rebels and the civilian 
          militias organised by the Addis Ababa government and paid for with sacks 
          of food taken from international aid, mainly that of the World Food 
          Programme.  
         
          The Somalis are doubly penalised in Ethiopia. On the one hand, they 
          represent a minority in relation to the other high plateau peoples (1) 
          with whom they live in a state of reciprocal hostility. On the other 
          hand, they are an extremely divided people, partitioned into rival groups. 
          At the height of the drought, the antagonism between clans deprived 
          many families of access to food and water, particularly along the region's 
          main river, the Wabe Shebele.  
         
          The threat of "somalisation" of the Ogaden haunts the Ethiopian government, 
          which has always neglected the Somali people but covets their land. 
          This huge, sparsely populated space could be an ideal agricultural frontier 
          for an Amhara nation in search of a demographic outlet.  
         
          Geographically, the Ogaden may be barren Sahel, but it holds enormous 
          unexplored quantities of natural gas - 35bn cubic metres, according 
          to a Russian evaluation conducted in the early 1980s. In 1997 a Chinese 
          firm signed a contract to produce liquefied gas with the help of the 
          World Bank. There is even a pipeline project to Harare (Zimbabwe), where 
          a refinery can be built.  
         
          Brought to heel  
        
        What better way to bring this rebellious province to heel than 
          to organise controls around the main perennial sources of water? Only 
          the deep wells have retained water. Some of them belong to private owners 
          who charge dearly for access. Others are controlled by the Ethiopian 
          army. Those who want access must pledge allegiance: here as elsewhere, 
          those who control food and water hold the power.  
         
          In April last year the Ethiopian military forbade access to the Wabe 
          Shebele river, toward which thousands of families were gathering, on 
          the pretext that it was full of bacteria. Food distribution, organised 
          under army rule in the areas with the greatest population, allowed tight 
          control over a territory until then poorly controlled by troops with 
          little regard for local populations.  
         
          The authorities' take-over of the region was exacerbated by the prospect 
          of general elections (held in May, except in the Ogaden where they were 
          postponed until August). The coalition already in power was elected 
          by a huge majority. The elections were for Council Members in the nine 
          federal states - the regional legislative bodies - and for the individual 
          administrative regions, as well as for the House of Representatives, 
          the federal legislative body.  
         
          The stakes are high for Addis Ababa in the Somali region because of 
          the principle of self-determination adopted by the Meles Zenawi government. 
          In the Ogaden, the previous elections, held in 1993, had brought to 
          power local leaders who were greatly tempted by independence. Only by 
          funding "friendly" parties did the central government succeed in limiting 
          the damage, at the cost of an increased military presence, financed 
          in part by United States aid.  
         
          Last year Human Rights Watch denounced the "secret war" in the Ogaden. 
          The province had become a huge, closed military camp in which the army 
          has carried out extortion and massacres, imprisoned people, and denied 
          access to water. In April, at the height of the drought, the army suddenly 
          changed its tactics and set itself up, unexpectedly, as the good Samaritan. 
          It transported food and organised aid. Even if the quantities it distributed 
          were insufficient - and distribution methods were a far cry from those 
          used by real humanitarians - the aim was clear: the impact of food distribution 
          a few weeks from the election could only work in favour of candidates 
          for a federal administration that had, until then, been struggling to 
          impose its legitimacy.  
         
          Cashing in on the famine  
        
        The means, however, were lacking. The fratricidal trench warfare 
          between Ethiopia and Eritrea had been draining all the country's vital 
          forces since May 1998 (2), with great loss of men, materials and financial 
          means. Receiving international aid while rallying Ethiopians around 
          a national disaster was an excellent move by the regime. On the pretext 
          that roads and transportation infrastructure were lacking, the government 
          concentrated the media and aid agencies in a calm area that was well 
          controlled by the military. Its epicentre was the city of Gode, which 
          has one of this under-equipped region's few airports. All the news reports 
          by the world media on the "Ethiopian famine" were done in the same 50 
          kilometre radius - most of them in Denan, a town 40 kilometres from 
          Gode, where the famine was particularly visible.  
         
          Symbols of absolute desolation, the bodies of dead cows lined the road 
          from Gode to Denan. The cadavers were dragged along the road, carefully 
          aligned and straightened up as often as possible - props for the famine 
          display. The authorities led the westerners to the Denan cemetery to 
          show them a few freshly dug children's graves and criticise the international 
          community for its lateness in sending aid. They did not mention that, 
          shortly before, they were still refusing to allow any western humanitarian 
          aid organisation to be present.  
         
          In April Ethiopia was promised five times more food aid than had been 
          planned before the media coverage of the famine. Close to 900,000 tons 
          were promised - a considerable amount, and not tied to the cease-fire 
          with Eritrea, since Addis Ababa had categorically refused to give in 
          to such "blackmail". Crucially, this amount of aid was not founded on 
          the real numbers of starving people.  
         
          In March the humanitarian aid organisations hesitated to estimate the 
          numbers of victims. But the mission head present in the afflicted zone 
          estimated that about 1m people - almost a third of the Ogaden's population 
          - needed emergency food aid. But in early April the government announced 
          that 2m people had been hit by the famine. In a few days the numbers 
          of starving people were reported to have doubled, reaching 4m - then 
          doubled again to 8m. A visit by the director of the World Food Programme 
          (WFP), who was taken by the authorities to the northern Tigray region, 
          geographically opposite to the epicentre of the disaster, resulted in 
          an additional doubling of the estimate - now 16m people! The WFP and 
          Unicef, taking over from the Ethiopian government, then requested aid 
          for the entire northern part of the country, on the grounds of drought. 
          Yet in the Tigray, the British NGO Save the Children did not see any 
          deterioration of the food situation.  
         
          The impressive number of 16m is a dangerous extrapolation, based on 
          a very limited geographic reality - that of acute malnutrition in the 
          area surrounding Gode. It corresponds to the total number of people 
          living in the regions of the Horn of Africa that have suffered from 
          lack of rain to one degree or another.  
         
          We know, however, that people will not be equally affected. Famine sifts 
          through the population, selecting the most vulnerable. Nevertheless, 
          the call has been heard and 900,000 tons of grain have been promised. 
          Such a volume of aid can meet the chronic need for food in Ethiopia, 
          one of the 17 countries in the world said to be at "major risk". But 
          the starving people of the Ogaden may only receive a small part of this 
          aid, since the ports of Berbera and Djibouti are physically incapable 
          of absorbing this kind of tonnage, and the government has categorically 
          ruled out using Eritrean ports.  
         
          This humanitarian disaster has little to do with nature. The Ethiopian 
          government has cynically used the drought in the Ogaden to obtain the 
          maximum amount of aid in the shortest possible time.  
          
        * Geographer and author 
          of La faim dans le monde, comprendre pour agir, PUF, Paris, 1999  
          The Oromos, Amharas and Tigrayans; the latter number 3m according to 
          the most recent census and are themselves a minority in relation to 
          the Oromos, even though they control the political power.  
          See Jean-Louis Péninou, "Ethiopia invades Eritrea", Le Monde diplomatique, 
          English edition, July 2000.   
        Translated by Carole Beaulieu   |